Google still
dominates the search engine sphere with their market share. Facebook, however,
does not seem to be far behind. Google Adwords and Facebook ads hold similar functionalities;
most importantly, their large audience. Both are primarily pay-per-click
advertising channels, despite the fact that they both offer additional
advertising options (Casey, 2011). Both offer free marketing tools, like
Facebook Pages and Google Places, that do not require an ad buy (Casey, 2011).
The two are also similar in that they both allow users to run campaigns that
target specific market segments.
In order to
determine which platform is best for one's business, then the goal of the
campaign must first be identified. This is because Internet users do not
necessarily search Google and check their Facebook pages in the same way.
Facebook ads may be a better match for building brand awareness or to relay a
specific message, considering that the Facebook session usually lasts longer
than your average Google search (Casey, 2011). This especially holds true if
the message is also targeted to a specific, unique segment of viewers; for
instance, those who watch a certain television show or belong to a specific
group. This specific criterion, which is more people-oriented, would not be as
easy with AdWords.
When it comes to
straight web searches, Google takes the advantage. They are more effective at
driving clicks and conversions around certain products (Casey, 2011). People
typically log onto to Facebook to check their pages, post photos, or update
their status', while those who search on Google are have a more specific
goal/product that they are looking for. If a business is in the videogame
market, for instance, then it would make more sense to buy certain keywords,
versus targeting these consumers on Facebook.
Because Facebook
holds lower click through rates than Google, their ads are more traditional,
but with more precise targeting. Facebook ads seem to be better designed to
build a brand or relay a certain marketing message over a longer period of
time, whereas Google does a better job at reaching those consumers that are
wanting to buy right then and there, which is why the click through rates are
so high (Casey, 2011). Advertisers are able to secure their intent at the right
time. In terms of usability, both platforms have been touted as having about
the same level of complexity. Facebook may pull in an advantage just because
most everyone is familiar with the interface. Google AdWords seems to be more
challenging in that it offers so many features and functions that have to be
learned and some smaller businesses may find Google AdWords overwhelming.
Google now seems
to be offering more demographic-specific options through its Google Display
Network. There is now more of an emphasis on retargeting, or behavioral
marketing or remarketing, where ads are shown to users based on their past Web
activity (Casey, 2011). The implication here are that these ads can actually
follow the intended audience through the particular company's partner sites. In
comparison, Facebook ads will stay within Facebook. Through Facebook, one
specifies exactly where they went or what they like and on Google, it is
basically inferred based on one's Internet behavior (Casey, 2011).
No comments:
Post a Comment